Country, County and Choice
I don’t “believe” in abortion. I don’t “approve” of
abortion. I think it’s a sad and tragic decision whenever a woman is faced with
an unfortunate and unplanned pregnancy that demands such a choice be made. Not
all pregnancies are the result of irresponsible, reckless or wanton behavior.
There times when forcing a woman to carry a fetus to term will only result in
the destruction of both her life and the life the child. But what I think
doesn’t matter.
The only person who has the right to make that decision…
whether to terminate a pregnancy or not… is the woman whose body and life will
be affected by it. The Supreme Court ruling in Roe vs. Wade that recognized the
right of a woman to undergo a safe and legal abortion has been the law of the
land for almost half a century. It took a back alley practice out of the hands
of butchers and gave it to the legitimate doctors that were willing to help
women take control of their lives and bodies; often at the risk of their own
lives and careers.
For decades, opponents of abortion have fought tooth
and nail to take away the rights of women when it comes to abortion. Using both
legal and lethal means, Right wing conservatives, highly religious groups and
extreme zealots have been trying to deny women anywhere in our country the fundamental
right that Roe vs. Wade recognized. They want to prohibit women from accessing
safe and legal abortions despite polls that say the majority of Americans
believe in a woman’s right to choose.
States are passing ever more restrictive laws that are
designed to deny women access to abortion services regardless of the reasons. Even
in cases where the pregnancy is the result of a rape or incest or where the
health of the mother is threatened. Most of these laws have been struck down as
unconstitutional by courts. Sadly, that doesn’t stop states, usually states
that are controlled by the Republican Party, from trying.
If the leak of the draft opinion is correct it seems that the SCOTUS is about to reverse Roe vs Wade and hand the anti-abortion movement their wish. But it just might be a case of being "careful what you wish for" for abortion opponents.
It brings to mind another attempt to prohibit the
American people from exercising a right that everyone was granted but did not
necessarily indulge. A small but very motivated group of zealots managed to get
the members of congress to pass a constitutional amendment banning the sale and
consumption of alcohol across the nation. Despite the fact that about two
thirds of Americans did not approve of prohibition, the proponents of the issue
used tactics that targeted individual members of congress. They organized in
local ways that threatened the jobs of national politicians.
Their actions and threats to evict from office any member
of congress that opposed them resulted in the capitulation of enough
politicians that they voted for the 18th amendment; not because they
cared about the issue, but they cared about keeping their jobs.
By the time the congress got around to repealing
prohibition 15 years later, by a measure that matched the numbers of Americans
that wanted it repealed, about 75%, the damage to our nation was done.
Organized crime syndicates were born and the violence and carnage that became
the trademark of such criminal enterprises became a part of our history that
still exists today. Once alcohol became legal again, the syndicates simply
moved on to such enterprises such as drugs, prostitution and gambling.
Despite the repeal, the results of the vote to repeal
prohibition did not mean that alcohol was available everywhere in the US. In
many states and counties, the sale and, in some cases, the consumption of
alcohol remained illegal. These places are often referred to as “Dry”
states or counties. There are 33 states that allow cities, towns and
counties to pass local laws and ordinances that control or outright ban
alcohol. There are 17 states that deny cities and towns the right to prevent
the sale and distribution of alcohol.
The opponents of abortion rights are trying similar
tactics in their fight to ban abortion nationwide. They are using the courts
and flooding them with legal challenges. They are targeting politicians in districts
where voters are largely Pro-life and using a single issue to force politicians
to agree or lose their job. They want to force the entire nation to bend to
their will.
Prohibition was based on a small group’s moral standards.
While it succeeded for a short time, the damage it did to our country far
exceeded the benefits. In the end it came
down to where, instead of trying to impose the will of a minority upon the
entire nation, it became the responsibility of individual cities towns and
counties to decide for themselves whether they wanted to ban or allow alcohol
in their lives.
And therein lays the solution to a woman’s right to have
an abortion.
Trying to deny the rights of a specific group of people,
women, with laws that are based on moral or religious standards that have no
legal basis goes against everything that this nation is based on. The will of
the majority does not over-rule the rights of the individual. The concept of individual rights and liberties
are the bedrock that the Constitution was designed to protect.
I have a huge problem with any religious or political group
feeling they have some moral or divine imperative that compels them to make a
decision that impacts an entire nation. Deciding to have an abortion is an
immensely personal one. However, insisting that every community accommodates
that choice is unreasonable. If the
majority of people don’t want to allow abortions in their city or town, then
let the voters make the decision to ban it there.
The right to have an abortion is one that every woman was
promised by Roe vs. Wade. But that doesn’t mean that every municipality has to
allow such clinics to function within the boundaries of their community. Like
the sale of alcohol, communities should be allowed to deny the licensing and or
establishment of a business that the citizens, the voters, don’t approve of. And
no matter how you feel about abortion, a place that provides such a service is
a business.
People that comprise a community can’t deny women
their right to have an abortion. Yet, the people in any city, town or county,
by a formal vote, should have the right to permit or deny any business that
does not comport with their community standards. No matter how much revenue
such businesses bring in, these businesses will never be welcome.
However, there will be those communities that recognize
that such businesses mean money by way of taxes and fees that feed their
coffers.
The concept of what is moral does not relate to what is
legal. There are a lot of people who think that gambling is immoral. There are
a lot of places where it is both legal and encouraged. If you don’t want to
gamble no one can force you to wager your money. But, frankly, if someone wants
to gamble, it’s none of your business.
The Roe vs. Wade ruling guarantees an individual woman
the right to have an abortion, but it doesn’t force individual communities to accommodate
her in accessing those services. It is a matter of country vs. county. While it
is a right granted to every woman in our nation that does not mean that every
town in our country has to provide access to such a business.
What a woman does with her body, with her life, is no-one’s
business. Yet, that doesn’t mean everyone has to do business with her. Many communities will not allow abortion services to do business in their jurisdiction. There are just as many places where the citizens will recognize the right and take advantage of the taxes and revenue that these businesses provide.
You may
think it is wrong, but that doesn’t make you right.